The
twig runes of Brodgar
Carved into the broken stump of one of the stones of the Ring o'
Brodgar in Stenness, is a group of Norse runes.
The runes are found on the third standing
stone, counting clockwise from the ring's north-western entrance causeway.
The style of the runes used on the Brodgar
stone is known as twig runes - so called because of their twig-like
appearance.
These twig runes are cryptographic and are deciphered
by counting the branches on either side of the rune (right then
left) and referring to a corresponding letter from the chart.
The Brodgar runes were found in 1907, during an
operation to erect a fallen stone. When the stone was lifted, the
runic script was discovered on the side that had been lying on the
ground.
But attempting to translate the Brodgar runes
using the normal method of decrypting twig runes yields nothing
- either NROUN or possible NUON.
Shortly after their discovery, the scholar Magnus
Olson read the runes from right to left. Ignoring a faint "branch"
on the furthest right rune, he stated the runes read "biorn",
representing the personal name "Bjorn".
Olsen's theory is not entirely accepted, however.
 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
f |
u |
th |
o |
r |
k |
2 |
h |
n |
i |
a |
s |
|
1 |
t |
b |
m |
l |
y |
|
|
In his paper on Orkney's runes, Michael Barnes
questioned the "Bjorn" translation.
Even if we could accept Olsen's two assumptions
about the inscription, he wrote, there is still a problem with the
second rune - the non-twig rune representing "u" or possible
"r".
In short, although there have been theories proposed
about the origin and translation of the Brodgar twig runes, we can
not say with any certainty that they can be translated.
The lost Brodgar inscription
The 'Bjorn' runes were not the only runes unearthed
at Brogar in the early years of the 20th century - although
the second example has since been lost.
The second Brodgar runic inscription was found
in 1908, carved into a loose stone discovered in the
south-western section of the stone circle.
The inscription showed a solitary twig rune, with
a cross underneath, exactly like the other Brodgar runes. But because
it was a loose stone, the find has since been lost.
Fortunately, however, the inscription was documented
before the stone was lost and showed a (3/4) rune that is translated
as "O".
Once again Magnus Olson suggested this represented
the initial of a personal name such as "Olaf" - echoing
his "Bjorn" interpretation for the standing stone rune.
Michael Barnes, however, points out that the missing
rune is simply a mirror image of the second twig rune on the "Bjorn"
inscription - even incorporating the cross beneath the rune.
Was it, he suggested, merely a later copy scratched
into a stone by a visitor to the Ring o' Brodgar? A copy that was
later discarded by the creator? |